Saturday, April 29, 2006

real life

So my uncle Babush, the grey sheep? is visiting from Pittsburg for a month, so I'll try real life for a bit. Had been on some MAC MMORPG into the desert or tale in the desert, yep, God that was boring. People pay programmers to do menial work over, in a quasi reality programme, why not just do menial work for real and get paid for it instead? Real life is not too bad in the summer. See you when it all gets too much.

Friday, April 28, 2006

the politics of sex and fat bastard

So this guy says that Prescott used to have the moral authority to deliver an ultimatum to Blair to force his resignation but now he doesn't. But that's not that great for Blair because it just means none of the cabinet can muster enough moral authority to demand the resignation of a lying murderous toe-rag. Half a million hits on the Beeb Web page, that story about Fat Bastard and his secretary, i suppose usual internet thing. 1 million for big phil becoming the next england manager when we fail to win the world cup this time. And apparently no one blames big ears the home sec because it's quite a hard job to do really really, i'll give it a go then, and anyway the civil servant in charge of the dept responsible for the current pecadillo got a promotion. You work for the Home Office if you lack the talent to work for the FCO, and you go into the civil service when you show a lack of talent but have a good education. I so truly missed my vocation but it's never too late, I wonder if they offer job share in the Home Civil Service. So I thought I'd let Constable Scott enjoy his long weekend with the kidz and then start the whole feedback complaints process again. Dear Constable Scott you have seven days to respond etc of course if I write a letter recorded delivery to CX Chief Super then he will respond because otherwise it gets bucked up the chain and what else do people do except pass paper back and forth. Reminds me of that pregnant woman murdered by her boyfriend, the copper thought shall i go visit some hysterical hormonal bint if i were her ex-boyfriend, of course I can't abide men wot hit their women, but I'll give the wife a smack if she needs one, or shall i go investigate the case of a poor doggie trapped in a car with the windshields down. It's not that hot but as summer develops I sicken positively sicken when little doggies or big doggies are trapped in cars with the windows wound fully up, it saddens me to see the state that so called decent people, anyway this time the boyfriend murdered the mother and child. I bet that copper gets a promotion mind. It's not about success, we aren't amurkans, it's about the cut of his gib and a man who cares about the plight of doggies will do well in this man's police force.

Apparently when the journalist telephoned Fat Bastard, or the Right Honourable John Jack Prescott the people's deputy PM, he was calm, his main concern was the damage and hurt that would come to his family, his wife, does he have kids I have no idea. Are his parents alive, well your mum always backs you she never liked the wife. No my standards have dropped. He is a very fat very old ugly man with power, but he will say it was because of his bubbly vivacious personality that drew his secretary into sex, he might as well have been a senior clerk in a small bank because when you have a bubbly vivacious personality you clearly become a pussy magnet. And my standards, I would have been more troubled by the corruption, the incompetence, admitting to incomeptence and still carrying on regardless, that and the case of the psychotic world view of the Health Minister. But it's more fun to ruin families in a vengeful spiteful way and call it politics and being in the public interest. Why don't we just return to robber barons and be done with this voting crap. At least they never lied about who they were who they stood for, you got lucky with a longbow, and anybody could win an election.

Wednesday, April 26, 2006

on my day off

I decided to return to an MMORPG but this was quite fun coz i didn't talk to anyone, just spent all day and now I am cap'n of a Wraith cargo ship but it has two cannon and a missile launcher, come on, tell me that is not impwessive.

So what happens. The Home Secretary offers his resignation because he let a thousand illegal alien criminals on the streets coz he had been too busy stopping the vulnerable asylum seekers and took his eye of whatever it was, then he said oh but it all happened when Blunket was in charge, then it turns out 700 maybe but 300 hundred were his, even the murderers, rapists and paedophiles just disappeared, no idea where they are, but not abroad. So the PM rejected the tender of the resignation. So the Deputy PM two jags, aka Fat Bastard he admits (boasts) of having an affair with one of his secretaries. Ah well that's what they pay you the big bucks for. And Patricia Hewitt who is linked to another scandal to do with her hubbie, i am not confusing her with Tessa Jowell, she is a health minister anyway she gets laughed off stage booed off by the nurses because thousands are being sacked this month because of a little mix-up with the budget but she went for hyperbole and insists that this is the bestest year ever for the NHS.

Nothing will happen for a while, but May the fourth be with you people. I wonder if that nice Constable Scott will email me again tomorrow. Ah i fear i may not pursue the life of a starship captain for longer than the one week free trial. There is just too much to do?

I am pleased to announce

As official as anything quakerish is official. Having been invited to introduce myself after the notices at the end of last Sunday's meeting, my name's Desie I hope to come again. After this Wednesday's meeting I feel I can claim now to be an Attendee, that's like a Grandee but no cigar, no hint of spanish hidalgo aristocracy, no really really light grey andalousian, but it's hard to conceal the pride, ill just smirk a little for a while. I am proud of my smirk.

So where to now. I think this is it. I hardly think I am going to insist on being entered into the rolls, anyone who feels he has to be placed on a list to become a quaker methinks is missing the point of quakerism. I am now a friend of the society of friends.

Of course if I begin to quake that is another matter entirely.

Tuesday, April 25, 2006

Let's press on then

I wrote an interesting (well i thought it was) defence against Neo-Platonic attacks of Aristotle's definitions of place. He offers two innermost motionless boundary, and contiguous space. Two fisherman are rowing in a river and weigh anchor and start to fish. The salmon are leaping into the nets. So they decide to mark the side of the boat so the next day they can return to the same place. I argued that contiguous space is the theoretical or logo men definition and innermost motionless boundary was the practicable or ergo de definition, because sometimes the contiguous space isn't static. For my next application I thought i'd use National Grid Eastings and Northings for the TQ area of the UK. The national grid goes to 3 figures eastings and northings, which makes a hundred metre square the smallest grid reference. Let's see if it gets challenged eh.

Dear Constable Scott,

I have had some time to consider your points for
clarification it may indeed take us till October to
come to an agreement on what i wrote.
--- Ian.Scott3@met.police.uk wrote:
Could you just confirm the following:
> >
> > 1. You wish to Start you picket / demonstration
> at
> > midnight 4 / 5 November 2006 for a period of 24
> > hours.

There appears to be a little confusion here. I am
happy to take the time to clarify matters for you. I
have made four separate requests for the Commissioner
to consider, so let us try to untangle the mess.

What you are describing essentially is the first
request for an authorization. However, it is illegal
to picket parliament under SOCPA 2005 section 134 s3,
even were the Commissioner to allow such a
demonstration the senior officer on the ground could
easily find the peaceful picketing of parliament as a
serious organised crime as you well know having
already arrested 28 citizens for demonstrating outwith
parliament with permission and having convicted one
person (since overturned on appeal) for demonstrating
with permission but straying into an unauthorized
part of the designated area where her demonstration
was then deemed to have become illegal by the senior
officer on the ground.

So the first clarification I am seeking authorization
to demonstrate, not to picket parliament. I think it
was rather naughty of you to try to suggest that I had
any illegal intention of picketing parliament.

As to the timing. To make it clear that I have no
intention of picketing parliament let the
authorization read for one hour. Beginning a few
minutes before midnight and extending for about an
hour. Should you require notice as to which specific
minute before midnight I intend to begin the
demonstration please email me and we can continue this
discussion.

Now to your second point.

> > 2. You then wish to start again at midnight 5 / 6
> > November 2006 until 5 November 2007 will this also
> > be 24 hours a day.

This is a very poor misreading of my notice to the
Commissioner. I am entitled to make multiple
applications in any one recorded delivery notice. That
is what I have done. You describe a second application
there are two others. The second application was
similar to the first but encompassed a nightly vigil
every night as you describe from 5/6 November 2006
until 5 November 2007. Again I do not desire to picket
parliament for the reasons already given so let the
authorization read for about an hour as for the first
application.

The third application was to discover how precise the
time duration and place element of SOCPA 2005 was
being enforced in my case by the Commissioner. Does he
regard me as a significant terrorist threat whom he
must rein in or would he allow me some leeway in
demonstrating peacefully outwith my own parliament.
Hence my third application was for me, to demonstrate
at any time as long as I live, for any purpose,
outwith my own parliament. You have not addressed that
request at all.

Also after an email from Inspector Helen, it was my
understanding that you were not now enforcing the
blanket ban on loudspeakers of any kind. May I
therefore have written permission to carry a
loudspeaker for emergency use. This would be to
prevent an overzealous copper on the ground unaware of
the law interfering with a citizen going about his
lawful business outwith his own parliament.

The fourth notice was a simple request for
clarification which you can certainly deal with. Will
the Commissioner clarify whether walking around the
Houses of Parliament with an anti US foreign policy,
anti-war anti-Blair T shirt or any political badges
constitutes a demonstration under the SOCPA 2005 act.
Given that the Home Secretary has declined to offer
him any guidance on this matter it appears to be left
to his discretion. What is the Commissioner's
determination on this matter.

I look forward the next round in clarification. It is
far better for us to keep a record of these exchanges
then for telephonic discussion when you will clearly
need to find information unlikely to be available off
the cuff.

yours sincerely

DesieX

> > The location will be shown as the original letter.

> Dear Mr Coutinho,
>
> thank you for your reply I await confirmation of
> details.
>
> If in the meantime if you have any question please
> contact me on the number below.
>
> Ian Scott
> Pc281CX
> Operations Office
> Charing Cross Police Station
> Agar Street
> WC2N 4JP
>
> # Phone 0207 321 (4) 7524
> # Fax 0207 321 (4) 7527
> # E-Mail ian.scott3@met.police.uk
> operations-cx@met.police.uk
>

change of pace

Ah well but if it were simple then it would not be bureaucracy, the young constable has asked me about starting my Picket / Demonstration. Odd choice of words. Horsie types will know that 'osses never trample people if they see you, nor will charge through a line of men. I was once asked then presumably all you have to do to stop a cavalry attack is to stand still. Basically yes. You could lie down if you were in plain sight of the osses, or you could form square. The horse would either pull up and throw the rider, or go around. What is the relevance. A picket it's the tactic used by the Scots at Bannock Burn, the one they win after William Wallace is dead. Braveheart. Anyway you plant a picket into the earth and it points outwards and the 'osse is definitely not going to charge that, it's bigger more powerful than the rider and if you want to go charge into it the horse will pull up because it's also a darn bit more intelligent than the average rider. I could respond today but where would the fun be in that. He isn't going to reply till October 6, so any suggestions when I should respond to his feeble attempts at trying to get me to go on a date. Men are so lazy these days. Do you see how many times he has asked for my number, can i meet him here and there and for reasons that have nothing to do with SOCPA 2005. First we have to meet to discuss matters of high state and security, then it's could I point out to him the exact place I want to demonstrate, while no doubt he offers me a supportive arm, and now it's can I tell him the exact times I want to picket and demonstrate (I don't want to picket will there actually be a cavalry charge on parliament by the blues and royals) and apparently the only way he can find this stuff out is if i meet with him over lunch some day. I don't think so. I am a lady. Well this is what I told him, it's only fair to let them down gently are we agreed gentlemen.

I think instead I'll start a fresh application to join the illegal tea parties, this one he can keep on file then, don't bother me.

Dear Constable Scott,

As you have stated that you are aiming to send the
authorization to me on or about the beginning of
October 2006 I shall take the matter under advisement
and respond to your two requests for factual
confirmation and your rather flattering and repeated
requests for a physical assignation, in due course. My
own policy is to respond to requests within fourteen
days, if you feel you have been unfairly treated by me
you may write to me by recorded mail and I will assign
someone who knows me well to deal with your complaint
in an appropriate manner, though of course since I
feel i myself better than many I may indeed deal with
your complaint myself.

That will be all for now, Constable.

a toute a l'heure
DesieX
--- Operations-CX@met.police.uk wrote:

> Dear Mr Coutinho,
>
> thank you for your reply below.
>
> Could you just confirm the following:
>
> 1. You wish to Start you picket / demonstration at
> midnight 4 / 5 November 2006 for a period of 24
> hours.
>
> 2. You then wish to start again at midnight 5 / 6
> November 2006 until 5 November 2007 will this also
> be 24 hours a day.
>
> The location will be shown as the original letter.
>
> It would help if I could contact you by phone to
> discuss these matters, or as request have a meeting
> to discuss the events.
>
> As stated my Superintendent has to give authority.
> November is a long way away and I would look at
> getting the authorisation signed at the beginning of
> October 06 and posting out to you by recorded
> delivery.
>
> Rgds
>
> Pc Ian Scott
>
>
>
> ---Original Message-----
> From: Des Coutinho
> Sent: 25 April 2006 13:15
> To: Operations - CX
> Subject: RE: FAO Constable Scott that should
> conclude matters unless
> there is something you have forgotten?
>
>
> Dear Constable Scott,
>
> Why didn't you just say so to begin with Constable.
> I
> can save us both the time. I'd lke the exact place
> to
> be the same exact place that Superintendent Peter
> Terry already gave authorization for in his letter
> of
> authorization to me dated 27 March 2006 Your Ref
> 218/2006 the retention period for which is seven
> years
> so it should be with the bundle you already have.
> However if you are having difficulty finding the
> previous authorisation, allow me to quote the exact
> designated part within the designated area as
> previously authorized. 'on the footway at Parliament
> Square SW1.' I take it you accept that willing as I
> am
> to help the police with their inquiries, your Boss,
> Lord Blair of the Metropolis has not been given the
> power by parliament to do anything other than grant
> me
> an authorization. So unless you have another reason
> to
> delay I look forward to receiving my second
> authorization to demonstrate under SOCPA 2005. If
> you
> do not know the place to which the Superintendent
> refers I am sure he will be more than happy to take
> you for a tour, didn't they cover local geography in
> your induction. I shall be sure to take this matter
> up
> with the Commissioner in my next application.
>
> I take it that you have no comment to make about my
> other three requests to the Commissioner, a sort of
> work to rule as it were. I can't even tempt you to
> write no comment hmm.
>
> If you require more than one week to gain my
> authorization please let me know. Or if there is any
> other matter I can assist you with please feel free
> to
> email me, a copy of this correspondence can be found
> on my web page which will also be in my file.
>
> You are an absolute sweetie I shall have nothing but
> praise for you when I next write to the
> Commissioner.
>
> DesieX
>
>
> --- Operations-CX@met.police.uk wrote:
>
> > Dear Mr Coutinho,
> >
> > if we can meet in Parliament Square you can point
> > out where you wish to holds you demonstration.
> >
> > Once we have met I will get the Superintendent to
> > sign the authority as requested.
> >
> > If you want me to call please give me your number
> > and a time to call.
> >
> > Rgds
> >
> > Pc Ian Scott
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Des Coutinho
> [mailto:descoutinho@yahoo.co.uk]
> > Sent: 25 April 2006 10:42
> > To: Operations - CX
> > Subject: FAO Constable Scott reply to my complaint
> > against Helen Preece
> > 19/04/2006
> >
> >
> > Dear Constable Scott,
> >
> > Thank you for your response within the seven days
> > requested. I would rather meet with you in person,
> > would you be able to travel to Ealing Police
> > Station,
> > my schedule is embarrasingly free. If not please
> > reply
> > by email and I'll some recording equipment
> together
> > and we can chat over the telephone. I assume you
> are
> > aware that you do not have the authority not to
> > grant
> > authorization for a request to demonstrate within
> a
> > designated area, you may add conditions to noise
> and
> > size of banners as outlined by the SOCPA 2005, and
> I
> > am not required by SOCPA 2005 to provide you with
> > any
> > more information than that I have already provided
> > you
> > by recorded delivery. In fact you have already
> > arrested and convicted one citizen because he
> sought
> > to provided you the information request over the
> > telephone.
> >
> > Therefore once you have confirmed that your
> request
> > is
> > extra-legal and will bear no relevance to the
> > authorization for my demonstration outwith my own
> > parliament, that this matter is procedural only, I
> > will happly record our conversation for personal
> > use.
> > But I must insist that you respond via email
> > confirming that I have already fulfilled my
> > obligations under SOCPA 2005 and that the
> > Commissioner
> > has no alternative other than to issue me with an
> > authorization to demonstrate subject to the
> > conditions
> > laid out in SOCPA 2005
> >
> > yours
> >
> > Desie
> > (please do not telephone me i will need time to
> set
> > up
> > recording equipment, alternatively if you have one
> > to
> > hand i could telephone you and you could send me a
> > copy of the recording hmmm)
> > --- Operations-CX@met.police.uk wrote:
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------
> > Reply to E-mail dtd 19/04/2006 and letter to
> > Commissioner
> > Dear Mr Coutinho,
> >
> > Inspector Helen Preece has passed your file on to
> me
> > to deal.
> >
> > Can I ask you to call me on the number shown below
> > to
> > discuss the details of your event on the 4
> November
> > 2006 (midnight) onwards.
> >
> > I am available all day today, but will be out of
> the
> > office all day Wednesday (26/04). Back in on
> > Thursday.
> >
> >
> > If possible I would also like to meet you to
> discuss
> > the event.
> >
> > Rgds
> >
> > Ian Scott
> > Pc281CX
> > Operations Office
> > Charing Cross Police Station
> > Agar Street
> > WC2N 4JP
> >
> > # Phone 0207 321 (4) 7524
> > # Fax 0207 321 (4) 7527
> > # E-Mail ian.scott3@met.police.uk
> > operations-cx@met.police.uk
> >
> >
>
**********************************************************************
> > It is the policy of the MPS that:
> >
> > MPS personnel (or agents working on behalf of the
> > MPS)
> > must not use
> > MPS systems to author, transmit or store documents
> > such as electronic mail (e-mail) messages or
> > attachments:
> >
> > * containing racist, homophobic,sexist,
> defamatory,
> > offensive, illegal or
> > otherwise inappropriate material;
> >
> > * for other than official or semi-official MPS
> > purposes;
> >
> > * containing material requiring a protective
> > marking
> > higher than
> > RESTRICTED, (and not higher than NOT
> PROTECTIVELY
> > MARKED across
> > the internet) without the use of approved
> > encryption;
> >
> > * containing personal data for use other than in
> > accordance with
> > the notification(s) under the Data Protection
> > Act,
> > 1998 of the
> > system(s) from which the data originates.
> >
> > * This Email message has been scanned for viruses
> > and
> > contents.

Too easy or do you mean it's too quiet captain

Taking him at his word, the honest copper merely wanted a grid reference, where in the Square mile outwith parliament did I actually want to place my static demonstration. If that is it then i'll get my authorization, if not the game continues.

Dear Constable Scott,

Why didn't you just say so to begin with Constable. I
can save us both the time. I'd lke the exact place to
be the same exact place that Superintendent Peter
Terry already gave authorization for in his letter of
authorization to me dated 27 March 2006 Your Ref
218/2006 the retention period for which is seven years
so it should be with the bundle you already have.
However if you are having difficulty finding the
previous authorisation, allow me to quote the exact
designated part within the designated area as
previously authorized. 'on the footway at Parliament
Square SW1.' I take it you accept that willing as I am
to help the police with their inquiries, your Boss,
Lord Blair of the Metropolis has not been given the
power by parliament to do anything other than grant me
an authorization. So unless you have another reason to
delay I look forward to receiving my second
authorization to demonstrate under SOCPA 2005. If you
do not know the place to which the Superintendent
refers I am sure he will be more than happy to take
you for a tour, didn't they cover local geography in
your induction. I shall be sure to take this matter up
with the Commissioner in my next application.

I take it that you have no comment to make about my
other three requests to the Commissioner, a sort of
work to rule as it were. I can't even tempt you to
write no comment hmm.

If you require more than one week to gain my
authorization please let me know. Or if there is any
other matter I can assist you with please feel free to
email me, a copy of this correspondence can be found
on my web page which will also be in my file.

You are an absolute sweetie I shall have nothing but
praise for you when I next write to the Commissioner.

DesieX


--- Operations-CX@met.police.uk wrote:

> Dear Mr Coutinho,
>
> if we can meet in Parliament Square you can point
> out where you wish to holds you demonstration.
>
> Once we have met I will get the Superintendent to
> sign the authority as requested.
>
> If you want me to call please give me your number
> and a time to call.
>
> Rgds
>
> Pc Ian Scott
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Des Coutinho
> Sent: 25 April 2006 10:42
> To: Operations - CX
> Subject: FAO Constable Scott reply to my complaint
> against Helen Preece
> 19/04/2006
>
>
> Dear Constable Scott,
>
> Thank you for your response within the seven days
> requested. I would rather meet with you in person,
> would you be able to travel to Ealing Police
> Station,
> my schedule is embarrasingly free. If not please
> reply
> by email and I'll some recording equipment together
> and we can chat over the telephone. I assume you are
> aware that you do not have the authority not to
> grant
> authorization for a request to demonstrate within a
> designated area, you may add conditions to noise and
> size of banners as outlined by the SOCPA 2005, and I
> am not required by SOCPA 2005 to provide you with
> any
> more information than that I have already provided
> you
> by recorded delivery. In fact you have already
> arrested and convicted one citizen because he sought
> to provided you the information request over the
> telephone.
>
> Therefore once you have confirmed that your request
> is
> extra-legal and will bear no relevance to the
> authorization for my demonstration outwith my own
> parliament, that this matter is procedural only, I
> will happly record our conversation for personal
> use.
> But I must insist that you respond via email
> confirming that I have already fulfilled my
> obligations under SOCPA 2005 and that the
> Commissioner
> has no alternative other than to issue me with an
> authorization to demonstrate subject to the
> conditions
> laid out in SOCPA 2005
>
> yours
>
> Desie
> (please do not telephone me i will need time to set
> up
> recording equipment, alternatively if you have one
> to
> hand i could telephone you and you could send me a
> copy of the recording hmmm)
> --- Operations-CX@met.police.uk wrote:
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Reply to E-mail dtd 19/04/2006 and letter to
> Commissioner
> Dear Mr Coutinho,
>
> Inspector Helen Preece has passed your file on to me
> to deal.
>
> Can I ask you to call me on the number shown below
> to
> discuss the details of your event on the 4 November
> 2006 (midnight) onwards.
>
> I am available all day today, but will be out of the
> office all day Wednesday (26/04). Back in on
> Thursday.
>
>
> If possible I would also like to meet you to discuss
> the event.
>
> Rgds
>
> Ian Scott
> Pc281CX
> Operations Office
> Charing Cross Police Station
> Agar Street
> WC2N 4JP
>
> # Phone 0207 321 (4) 7524
> # Fax 0207 321 (4) 7527
> # E-Mail ian.scott3@met.police.uk
> operations-cx@met.police.uk
>
>
**********************************************************************
> It is the policy of the MPS that:
>
> MPS personnel (or agents working on behalf of the
> MPS)
> must not use
> MPS systems to author, transmit or store documents
> such as electronic mail (e-mail) messages or
> attachments:
>
> * containing racist, homophobic,sexist, defamatory,
> offensive, illegal or
> otherwise inappropriate material;
>
> * for other than official or semi-official MPS
> purposes;
>
> * containing material requiring a protective
> marking
> higher than
> RESTRICTED, (and not higher than NOT PROTECTIVELY
> MARKED across
> the internet) without the use of approved
> encryption;
>
> * containing personal data for use other than in
> accordance with
> the notification(s) under the Data Protection
> Act,
> 1998 of the
> system(s) from which the data originates.
>
> * This Email message has been scanned for viruses
> and
> contents.

And Another Thing

So yesterday the coppers show off this incredibly sophisticated state of the art piece of software first of its kind anywhere in the universe. Stop rewind. It doesn't actually work does it. Blank look from copper. Just once you wish the journalist covering technical matters actually knew something about the field rather than having been salvaged from the merger of glamour model coverage and minor royals.

So the software, as far as I could tell, you take a photo of some johnnie, then you click manually arynde the eyes, didn't seem to be anywhere specifically but arynde the eye area. And then two cross hairs appear, and finally you click arynde the nose. Seems to be based on the idea that the proportions of eyes to nose identify us uniquely and of course will confirm that them wot has their eyes too close together, well we always knew about them.

But that's not the clever bit. The clever bit is that the software or computer as it sometimes called, then can pick up every single photo of said johnnie even when she wears a blonde wig, or puts a yashmak about her face or grows a beard what have you, because it's all very scientific, and to prove the efficacity of said software, it miraculous summoned up oh i'd say arynde 15 more photos (all seemed passport size by the way) of said journalist johnnie and indeed some she wore a scarf others a hat, or glasses all ver ver impwessive i am certain the amurkans don't have anyting like it else I should have seen it on CSI.

They might start having problems when they input more photos hmmm.

Though every now and then I see a photo of some sarge in the Met blonde hair dark glasses who was arrested under SOCPA 2005 for joining an illegal demo outwith parliament. Arrested but not charged. oo er missus. Perhaps they could use this cutting edge state of the art piece of crap to identify who the man is hmmm.

Oh yes the beautiful thing about this software stuff is it designed to stop paedophiles, no i shit you not, it is the latest in a high tech multinational multifaceted multi-technological plan to rid the world of paedophiles. I thought the problem was terrorists. I mean I am as much for giving police ultimate judge dredd shoot anyone who wants to work with children that'll stop the bloody paedophiles thing, but aren't we just giving them ridiculous powers outwith accountability because tony cares more about us whereas the conservatives chameleons they just care about protecting bomb running gun toting middle-eastern rag head illegal immigrant single parent fucking terrorists.

Stay on message Constable, the Daily Mail reader cannot cope with more than one nemesis at any one time, you don't want to get them started on paedophiles again otherwise you are going to have to provide round the clock protection for paediatricians, podiatrists etc etc. again. you recall the last time.

yeah and on my own weblog ill use any fucking anglo saxon term I please.

This is how we do bureaucratic terrorism

The met working towards a safer london have replied, it's dropped down to a lowly Constable, but I am sure he can handle matters outwith dropping the ball. They have asked for me to telephone to discuss why on earth I should want to demonstrate at midnight on Guy Fawlkes night, will i be bring fire works, is this a reenactment of the Warchowski bros film V for Vendetta. I merely point out in my reply it is none of the Met's concern. SOCPA 2005 is purely procedural. The courts don't look into human rights or democracy. It is a procedural matter. If I am correct the way to bring it to a standstill is to bump up requests from 150 since last November to today to thousands or hundreds of thousands. My response in full. He emailed I email. He writes letters I write letters. He uses Basildon Bond, I use Oxfam recycled rice paper from the Pilipinas.

Dear Constable Scott,

Thank you for your response within the seven days
requested. I would rather meet with you in person,
would you be able to travel to Ealing Police Station,
my schedule is embarrasingly free. If not please reply
by email and I'll some recording equipment together
and we can chat over the telephone. I assume you are
aware that you do not have the authority not to grant
authorization for a request to demonstrate within a
designated area, you may add conditions to noise and
size of banners as outlined by the SOCPA 2005, and I
am not required by SOCPA 2005 to provide you with any
more information than that I have already provided you
by recorded delivery. In fact you have already
arrested and convicted one citizen because he sought
to provided you the information request over the
telephone.

Therefore once you have confirmed that your request is
extra-legal and will bear no relevance to the
authorization for my demonstration outwith my own
parliament, that this matter is procedural only, I
will happly record our conversation for personal use.
But I must insist that you respond via email
confirming that I have already fulfilled my
obligations under SOCPA 2005 and that the Commissioner
has no alternative other than to issue me with an
authorization to demonstrate subject to the conditions
laid out in SOCPA 2005

yours

Desie
(please do not telephone me i will need time to set up
recording equipment, alternatively if you have one to
hand i could telephone you and you could send me a
copy of the recording hmmm)
--- Operations-CX@met.police.uk wrote:


---------------------------------
Reply to E-mail dtd 19/04/2006 and letter to
Commissioner
Dear Mr Coutinho,

Inspector Helen Preece has passed your file on to me
to deal.

Can I ask you to call me on the number shown below to
discuss the details of your event on the 4 November
2006 (midnight) onwards.

I am available all day today, but will be out of the
office all day Wednesday (26/04). Back in on Thursday.


If possible I would also like to meet you to discuss
the event.

Rgds

Ian Scott
Pc281CX
Operations Office
Charing Cross Police Station
Agar Street
WC2N 4JP

# Phone 0207 321 (4) 7524
# Fax 0207 321 (4) 7527
# E-Mail ian.scott3@met.police.uk
operations-cx@met.police.uk

**********************************************************************
It is the policy of the MPS that:

MPS personnel (or agents working on behalf of the MPS)
must not use
MPS systems to author, transmit or store documents
such as electronic mail (e-mail) messages or
attachments:

* containing racist, homophobic,sexist, defamatory,
offensive, illegal or
otherwise inappropriate material;

* for other than official or semi-official MPS
purposes;

* containing material requiring a protective marking
higher than
RESTRICTED, (and not higher than NOT PROTECTIVELY
MARKED across
the internet) without the use of approved
encryption;

* containing personal data for use other than in
accordance with
the notification(s) under the Data Protection Act,
1998 of the
system(s) from which the data originates.

* This Email message has been scanned for viruses and
contents.

**********************************************************************

Saturday, April 22, 2006

For Georgiu of Palestine and For England

So this being the vigil and Dr Who about to start can't be dawdling. Tomorrow a ceremonial burning of the Great Seal is planned after a fancy dress tea party outwith parliament apparently they have sought and obtained authorization under SOCPA 2005 so I guess i'll watch it on telly see if anyone gets arrested.

And yes the Met do have a complaints procedure. If Helen doesn't respond by 26 April then I take it up with her Chief Superintendant, the Commissioner and th IPCC in that order. So plenty of letters to write should keep me happy for more than a while.

Ah well I leave the world in other's hands. I am sure you will not drop the ball or betray the sacred trust we place in you, and I am off to watch Dr Who save the empress of India from a werewolf, not the ne'erdowell Tardis stealing nobody of yore, nor the mysterious aged professor, bit of a smartarse wideboy but how they grow up our heroes eh.

Friday, April 21, 2006

Never make war on a corpse

I could see how some rational idiot project manager ex labout spin doctor suggested, if we allow a funeral people will just use it as an excuse to mount a demo/march. So they sent 50 riot police and 'cremated' the body. Did the journalist actually say cremated the body by the side of the river (i think he said Basmati but isn't that a type of rice) and these fifty brave lads in riot gear with guns kept mourners at bay, and the family weren't there because they had taken away his body and they knew not where they had put him. You ignorant stupid scum, you thick pathetic moronic fools. So once the people found out what had happened, hundreds of thousands took to the streets, i have seen armed men beaten to death when there are that many angry people running around with passions aroused, so rather wisely the police let them torch and burn down government buildings calling for the removal of their king. Kings rule only with the consent of the people. Any King of any nation at any time. They could have shot many more of the living and he might have struggled on, but when he ordered the burning of a dead man, he lost the right to reign. Are they so strange the Nepalese. They are like Greeks or Romans or Japanese or French, men of history when honour was more than a memory, those days cannot return, but we can arise now and be that nation again who stood against him proud edward's army and turned him homeward to think again.

Happy Birthday Ma'am

My friend Orver who claims he does not wish to be the most feared force in independant publishing and finds himself compelled to crush his nemesis through no fault of his own because the game has taken over, i explained but they all say that and his brutal retort was although he needs melancholy to counterbalance his overweening ambition I, yes I bitter old twisted noman I still engage with life, still hope, mischief driven curiosity is not melancholy, well if that be the case, so be it.

Happy Sun return to Her Majesty Queen Bess II & I, may you live ten thousand years ma'am, so say all men goode and true.

Thursday, April 20, 2006

True to his word

Today I received an orange thank you card from Charlie Falconer's office at the Department of Constitutional Affairs, ten days to the day I applied to be a magistrate. The promise to process my application as quickly as they can. So sometime within the next six months to year then.

The thing about Britain is our bureaucracy is very polite and systematic. I am sure if I had to complain against Inspector of Events, Helen Preece, there is a set procedure and a time line that the Met working towards a safer London have agreed to abide by. In case you were wondering if there is a conflict here, I listed Political Activism as a hobby on my application to be a Keeper of the Queen's Peace.

Now I had wondered what sort of sentence would be appropriate in a vanilla case of violation of SOCPA 2005, pleading guilty to taking tea outwith parliament after having been duly warned by the senior police officer on the ground that the government was treating tea parties outwith parliament buildings as a serious organised crime, even the disorganised tea parties.

The two Ps and the four Rs, punishment of the offender and protection of the public, in these cases they seem to be in conflict, the offender and the member of the public being one in the same.

Reduction of Crime wouldn't happen with a fine because the defendant would then commit another crime by not paying seeking to be imprisoned. There is no reparation involved.

So the main criteria I should consider would be rehabilitation and reform of the offender.

I was thinking along the lines of a community service order whereby the convict would have to agree to present his case to students from political and law departments perhaps a dozen times and then listen to their feedback, preferably at provincial universities which would limit his ability to protest in London and therefore reduce the crime rate. He might see it as a compromise with which he could live. He is basically a prisoner of conscience, committing a political crime. Again I don't see the point in imprisoning him for up to 51 weeks at £3000 per week. All that will do is turn him into a hero and bring the law into disrepute. I wonder if they will buy any of that. It's the process eh.